Buying a Source to Pay System is Like Buying an Old House (S2P System M&A)6 min read

Picture of an old house in need of repair

Clients Shape Source to Pay Systems with Asks That Drive Development and M&A

You would think that selecting a source to pay system based on requirements coverage would be sufficient to make the best decision. However, I would argue that you should also understand how the system’s evolved over time before buying (development road map & acquisitions). Would you buy and old house before asking for the list of past renovations before buying?

An Old House’s Previous Owners Have Shaped the House’s Story

When you move in, the house is new for you, but it’s already gone through a lot. Since it’s initial construction, rooms has been used for different uses depending on the inhabitant’s requirements. They’ve also probably done renovations to satisfy specific needs or desires (sun room!). When you move in, regardless of your thoroughness during the inspection, you will find features you didn’t spot initially. Some of these will be a delightful surprise (there’s an ironing board in the kitchen cupboard!) and others will be a continuous bother, impossible to fix at a reasonable price (has this stair always squeaked as we walk by?).

When you seek to carry out renovations of your own, you might stumble upon a load bearing wall that prevents you from turning the kitchen and living room into “an open space”. To do so, you would need to tear down the whole house and start over (but how will I achieve feng shui?!). That’s why if you want to mold the house to your needs, you must understand the house’s evolution in addition to its current condition (easier said than done!). Can you get your hands on the initial blueprints? Does the city have any data on residents over the years and building permits they may have sought out? Can the current owners fill you in on the house’s stories? Now I hear you thinking: “What does this have to do with my system selection?”.

An Source to Pay System Vendor’s Previous Clients Shaped the Structure of the System

A Source to Pay system is a software product which has usually been developed over multiple years by multidisciplinary teams with different backgrounds and levels of expertise. In most cases, it will also be a mix of multiple different systems acquired and melded together over time. Yes, when you “move in” you are getting a fresh new copy of the system but it’s a copy of an “old house” that’s evolved based on previous customer requirements and asks that the parent company is trying to satisfy. Solution modules were “renovated” with development and/or acquisitions of other solutions (sun room!). When you “move in” and implement the Source to Pay system, regardless of your thoroughness during the RFP process, you will find features you didn’t identify or consider during the process. Some of these features will be a delightful surprise (a whole standard set of connectors to another solution you just bought!) and others will be a continuous bother that are impossible to fix at a reasonable price (what do you mean there’s no API to extract this specific piece of data!?).

When you attempt developments of your own (renovations) in the Source to Pay system, you might find out that certain back-end code logic prevents you from implementing the desired change (but how will you achieve business feng shui?!). That’s why if you want to mold the system your needs (or at the very least understand what standards and rules you will need to bend to), you must understand the system’s evolution in addition to its current condition (easier said than done!).

Mining the Source to Pay System’s Story Through the Rfx Process

As you initiate RFI and RFP processes, here are some questions you should consider asking to understand a potential system’s “story”:

  • Can you provide a list of company acquisitions and illustrate how these software assets have been integrated into your offering?
  • Have the acquired organizations been fully integrated into your company or do they still operate as separate entities? Can you detail the company structure (i.e. departments, business units)?
  • Is it possible to obtain a diagram of the back-end database structure?
  • Are all modules written in the same programming language? If not, how are you managing the integrations between different modules written in different languages?
  • How do you manage the organic development of your solution? Is it possible to get a tour of the product development operations?
  • Please provide references of mature clients so we can understand the intricacies of operating your system (IT and business contacts).

Being able to answer these questions before engaging in a long-term relationship with a strategic partner is important. It will ensure you understand the potential scope of challenges you will inevitably face over the course of the relationship. For example, you’ll be able to factor in considerations that might affect your ability to support the solution after Go-Live. Because, make no mistake, when you implement a Source to Pay system, you are starting a long-term relationship with a software vendor. And, just like with buying an old house, you want to prevent being haunted by the decision!

How Has M&A Shaped the Source to Pay Provider Landscape?

To illustrate how considering this type of information can inform your buying decision, I’ve compiled acquisition data for the Top 5 Source-to-Pay suites as listed in the 2018 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Source-to-Pay Suites: SAP Ariba, Coupa, Basware, Jaggaer & Ivalua. As you will notice, these companies all have very different acquisition profiles. Therefore, their product suites will have evolved very differently even if they support the same set of core processes.

SAP Ariba – 10 Acquisitions

Founded in 1996. Headquartered in Palo Alto, California, USA; acquired by software giant SAP in May 2012.

Acquired OrganizationDateCommentsPress Release
b-process2011-10e-invoicing network technology providerLink
Quadrem2010-11Supplier Network technology providerLink
Procuri2007-09Cloud sourcing, contract management, spend analysis and supplier management technology providerLink
FreeMarkets2004-06End-to-End procurement technology providerLink
Softface2004-03Spend management technology providerLink
Alliente2004-01Procurement Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) services providerLink
Goodex AG2003-01e-auction and sourcing technology providerLink
Suppliermarket.com2000-06Supplier Network technology providerLink
TRADEX Technologies1999-12Supplier Network technology providerLink
TradingDynamics1999-11eSourcing technology providerLink

Coupa Software – 17 Acquisitions

Founded in 2006. Headquartered in San Mateo, California, USA.

Acquired OrganizationDateCommentsPress Release
Pana2021-03Travel booking technology providerLink
LLamasoft2020-11AI-Powered Supply Chain Design and PlanningLink
Yapta2020-01travel booking technology provider (price optimization, tracking and booking flight tickets, and receiving airline refunds)Link
Exari2019-04Contract Lifecycle Management technology providerLink
Hiperos2018-12Supplier risk technology providerLink
Acquiire2018-10Real-time catalog search technology providerLink
DCR Workforce2018-09Contingent workforce and services procurement technology providerLink
Simeno Systems AG2017-12Advanced catalog management technology providerLink
Deep Relevance2017-10Fraud detection technology providerLink
Riskopy2017-05Supplier Risk technology providerLink
Trade Extensions2017-04Sourcing & sourcing optimization technology providerLink
Spend360 International2017-01Spend data enrichment technology providerLink
Contractually2016-01Contract control & red-lining technology providerLink
TripScanner2015-07Travel booking technology providerLink
Invoice Smash2015-07Cloud accounts payable & e-invoicing technology providerLink
ZenPurchase2015-02RFP & supplier onboarding technology providerLink
Xpenser2013-04Cloud expense management technology providerLink

Basware – 1 Acquisition

Founded in 2002. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

Acquired OrganizationDateCommentsPress Release
Verian Technologies2016-03Operational procurement cloud technology providerLink

Jaggaer (Formerly SciQuest) – 4 Acquisitions

Founded in 1995. Headquartered in Cary, North Carolina, USA; acquired by Accel-KKR private equity firm in May 2016. Accel-KKR’s majority stake sold to Civen in 2019.

Acquired OrganizationsDateCommentsPress Release
BravoSolution2017-11Program Management, Spend analysis, eSourcing, contract management & supplier performance management technology providerLink
Pool4Tool2017-06End-to-end direct materials procurement technology providerLink
CombineNet2013-09Advanced sourcing technology providerLink
Spend Radar2012-09Spend Analysis technology providerLink

Ivalua – 1 Acquisition

Founded in 2000. Headquartered in Redwood City, California, USA.

Acquired OrganizationDateCommentsPress Release
Directworks2017-10Direct materials procurement technology providerLink

Follow the S2P Vendor Stories as They Unfold

Regardless of if you’ve already purchased a Source to Pay system or are “window shopping”, one of the best ways to follow the evolution of these “stories” is to read vendor press releases and industry analyst blogs. Personally, I’ve added a number of sites to my RSS reader for a customized, “newspaper” of Source to Pay news. Although I am biased, I find it interesting to see how the Source to Pay system industry continues to evolve. I’ll share my list shortly so you can follow along!

———————————
How was your S2P system procurement experience? Did you find some vendors better than others at answering this type of “evolution” question? Are there any other product evolution questions that you include in your software RFx events? Let me know in the comments

If you liked this post, why not Subscribe

Last Updated on March 25, 2021 by Joël Collin-Demers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *